By In a significant move to uphold consumer protection laws, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has filed a lawsuit against MultiChoice Nigeria Limited and its CEO, John Ugbe.
The lawsuit comes after MultiChoice proceeded with a controversial price increase for its pay-TV services, DSTV and GOtv, despite regulatory orders from the FCCPC to halt the hike. The commission accuses the company of obstructing its inquiry and non-compliance with directives.
The Price Hike Controversy
In 2025, MultiChoice Nigeria, the parent company of DSTV and GOtv, announced an increase in subscription prices for its pay-TV services. The move immediately drew public outcry, with many consumers expressing dissatisfaction over the increased costs during an economic downturn.
However, the FCCPC swiftly intervened, ordering MultiChoice to halt the price hike, citing concerns over its impact on Nigerian consumers and its potential violation of fair competition practices. Despite the regulatory order, MultiChoice proceeded with the increase, leading to legal action from the FCCPC.
FCCPC’s Legal Action Against MultiChoice
The FCCPC’s lawsuit accuses MultiChoice Nigeria Limited and its CEO, John Ugbe, of proceeding with the price hike in defiance of the commission’s directives. According to the FCCPC, MultiChoice obstructed its inquiry by ignoring the regulatory orders, leading to the formal legal challenge.
In its statement, the FCCPC emphasized that MultiChoice’s actions not only violated consumer protection laws but also hindered the commission’s ability to enforce fair competition practices in the Nigerian pay-TV market. The commission has called for penalties, compensation for affected consumers, and a full reversal of the price increases.
Obstruction and Non-Compliance: Key Allegations
The FCCPC has outlined several key allegations in its lawsuit:
-
Non-Compliance with Directives: Despite the order to halt the price hike, MultiChoice continued to implement the increase, showing a blatant disregard for regulatory authority.
-
Obstruction of Inquiry: The FCCPC alleges that MultiChoice made it difficult for the commission to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter, potentially obstructing the inquiry process.
-
Harm to Consumers: The FCCPC argues that MultiChoice’s actions have harmed Nigerian consumers, many of whom are already struggling with rising living costs. The price increase, according to the commission, exacerbated the financial strain on these consumers, making it more difficult for them to afford access to essential services like entertainment and information.
The Broader Impact on the Nigerian Pay-TV Industry
This legal action is not just a battle between a regulatory body and a corporation; it also has wider implications for the Nigerian pay-TV market. MultiChoice, as the dominant player in the industry with services like DSTV and GOtv, holds a significant portion of the market share. Any ruling in this case could set a precedent for how regulatory bodies handle price hikes and consumer protection in the future.
The FCCPC’s stance on this issue signals a stronger commitment to consumer rights and competition in the Nigerian market. If successful, this lawsuit could force MultiChoice to reconsider its pricing strategies and align with more consumer-friendly policies.
Additionally, the case highlights the need for transparency and accountability in the pricing strategies of large corporations, especially in industries that affect millions of consumers.
MultiChoice’s Response and the Road Ahead
At the time of writing, MultiChoice Nigeria has yet to publicly comment on the lawsuit. However, it is expected that the company will mount a defense against the FCCPC’s claims, arguing that the price increases are necessary to sustain its operations in a challenging economic environment.
The outcome of this lawsuit is likely to have far-reaching consequences for the pay-TV industry in Nigeria. Beyond the potential financial penalties, MultiChoice may face increased scrutiny from both regulators and consumers in the future.
Conclusion: A Crucial Test for Consumer Protection in Nigeria
The lawsuit filed by the FCCPC against MultiChoice Nigeria marks a significant moment for consumer protection in Nigeria. With the price hike affecting millions of Nigerians, the legal action underscores the growing power of regulatory bodies to enforce fair competition practices and safeguard consumers’ rights.
As this case progresses, all eyes will be on the Nigerian judiciary to see how they rule on this important issue, and whether it will lead to stronger consumer protection laws and greater accountability for corporations in the country.
What are your thoughts on the price hike by MultiChoice and the FCCPC’s legal action? Do you think regulatory bodies in Nigeria are doing enough to protect consumers? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and stay updated on this developing case.
